Longer than a post. Shorter than a blog. Finished when the point lands.
One argument each. No headings inside, no throat-clearing, no padding to hit a word count somebody invented in 2013. It opens on the claim and it stops when the claim has landed.
The long pieces still exist and live on the blog. This is the other half.
Blogs are a format, not a law
Fifteen hundred words became the standard because it ranked, and it ranked because everybody agreed it would. Most of what any business needs to say is one idea that takes four hundred words and then stops. Padding it to hit a number is how a real thought turns into filler around a real thought.
This is how my head actually works
I have ADHD and I run several companies. The idea arrives whole, on a Tuesday, usually about something that annoyed me. Waiting until I have the patience to inflate it into a full post means it never ships. Every honest blog schedule I have ever seen dies in month two for exactly this reason.
Nothing gets deleted
These come out of the cutting. When a core page runs long, the material that comes off is not waste, it gets an address. Some becomes an FAQ answer. Some becomes a full post. The rest is this, and it is the half most sites throw away.
Everyone is selling you GEO. Almost nobody can tell you what they are testing.
Generative engine optimisation is the term of the year. It got bolted onto every agency deck inside about six months, priced, and sold, mostly by people who are running the same SEO playbook as before with a new word on the invoice.
Here is the honest position, which nobody selling it will give you: the engines are new, they change without warning, and anybody claiming a settled method for a system that shipped recently is describing a hunch with confidence.
What can be said with some support is that these systems reward material with clear authority, a distinct point of view, and a voice that is identifiably somebody. A model summarising an answer has to choose what to cite, and it cannot cite the middle of a distribution, because the middle is everywhere and belongs to no one.
So a fifteen-hundred-word post that carefully covers a topic may be the exact wrong shape for the thing doing the citing.
A field note is one claim, stated once, attributable, with no filler around it for a machine to wade through. That is the hypothesis. It might be wrong.
We are running it on our own site before we run it on yours, because selling an untested method is the thing this whole company exists to complain about.
Hypothesis. Short, dense, single-claim pieces in a distinct voice get cited by generative engines more readily than long comprehensive posts covering the same ground.
Method. Both formats run side by side on this domain, on overlapping subject matter, with the same author and the same technical setup.
Measure. Citations and mentions in AI answers for the topics both formats cover, tracked over time.
Results so far. [RESULTS: Daniel publishes the real numbers here once there are any. This bracket ships visible until then, because a page about untested claims cannot open with an untested claim.]
If it fails, that gets published here too, in the same place, at the same size.
One idea each. Read one, not the set.
More landing continuously. They come out of the cutting, so the supply is whatever got trimmed off a page that week.
The Periodic Table of Promotion
Every channel worth running, and the accounts they’re included in, helping you plan and stay organized.
Want this format pointed at your business?
The deep dive is where the ideas come from. Fifteen minutes first, free, and a human picks up.